Thursday, October 13, 2022

EU votes on biocidals today and tomorrow

Committees: Committees

13/10 ---------- 5star ----- k148 --- 24-electr

The Glyphosate Renewal Group (GRG)
Bribers, braggarts and diabolic liar lobby: "The GRG website- more than 2 years of unprecedented transparency" [since spring 2020, 9 languages], "The most searched terms were ‘glyphosate’, ‘the AGG’ (Assessment Group on Glyphosate), and ‘biodiversity’." ---------------- grg@glyphosate.eu

i called them on their bullshit and get their standard rep as 'reply' .... 11p 'note' and 151p document ... via the lobby shills at glyphosate.eu in brussels

Phytopharmaceuticals LEGISLATION = votes today and tomorrow by SCoPAFF [Standing committee on pesticides]

if Putin wasn't such a pharmafiya cuck he'd place these institutions right next to the biolab rash on his priority target list ....

end of the 'note':
Overall conclusion
RAC did not find sufficient evidence to support a genotoxic mechanism of action for glyphosate. It concluded, based on the epidemiological data as well as on data from long-term studies in rats and mice, taking a weight of evidence approach and in line with the proposal of the Dossier Submitter, that no hazard classification for carcinogenicity is justified for glyphosate according to the CLP criteria. Concerning toxicity to reproduction, RAC recommended no classification for either fertility or development. However, RAC agreed with the DS that the existing classifications for eye damage (category 1) and long term hazard for the aquatic environment (category 2) should be retained and that no classification for any of the other hazard classes was warranted.

 

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Newer Posts Older Posts
Startpagina