Zio Walls as Vital as Cell Walls
3rd world wars on krystaldjinnz who lost site of 'their' leader apparantly
11/02 ---- 12Seed -------- k64 ----- 05/08: {lot}
25m clip collection: youtu.be/5_gJeDbKywk
Last Line Of Faith | Who Holds The Key?
Boris Malagurski -- 4.3K/4h ... 190k half a day later
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5_gJeDbKywk?si=vYoZDce8aWT3YR6B" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Last Line Of Faith | Who Holds The Key?
Boris Malagurski == 146K subscribers
190,498 views Premiered Feb 9, 2026
Western media decides which faiths deserve attention — and which suffering can be ignored.
Now, that silence is breaking.
Through archival footage, firsthand testimonies, and places rarely shown on screen, this film examines the global persecution of Christians — from burned villages in Nigeria to erased communities in the Balkans. It looks at how violence is explained away, how narratives are shaped, and how one of the world’s largest religious groups became invisible in plain sight.
At the center of the story is faith itself — as a way of life. From communities targeted for their beliefs to those who quietly preserved them despite war, sanctions, and political pressure, the film follows a line that connects Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and the West.
Why are attacks on Christians so often reframed, minimized, or dismissed?
Why do some victims make headlines — while others barely exist? And what happens when faith itself becomes the target?
00:00 - Intro
01:10 - Enter Nigeria
03:20 - Genocide Happening Now
08:35 - Bosnian Islamic Declaration
10:19 - Alija Izetbegovic Exposed
12:46 - Clinton - Bin Laden Connection
14:29 - 9/11 Bosnian Terrorists
16:00 - Orthodox Christianity
20:42 - Christian Attacks Ignored
22:55 - Solving T
Video 2
55m ...... i think this is the one with that 'leader + sidekick' list, to show how assistence is awfully essential to movement success ... but that might have been the Fard thing also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx5TzjRkiFc
The Nonbinary Quaker Messiah
Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities
14K views • 10 hours ago
50,120 views Feb 6, 2026
Another wandered off into the woods of Maine and claimed to have prophetic dreams from the friend, but
47:03
had no success in reestablishing the friend's cult. The Society of Universal Friends continued to exist all the way
47:10
until 1874, but mostly as a charity, losing its remaining religious trappings
47:16
just a few years after the Friend's death. To start a successful cult, you don't need a charismatic leader. Or
47:22
rather, you do, but that's not all you need. You need two charismatic leaders.
47:28
You need the visionary and the successor. Ideally, the second one should be even more charismatic. To
47:34
build a movement as powerful as, say, Mormonism, which began not too far away
47:39
from where the public universal friend died just a few decades later, you need not just Joseph Smith, but also Brigham
47:46
Young. You need George Fox and William Penn. You need Elron Hubard and David
47:51
Mscavage. You need Jesus and the apostles. You need Elazar Yukowski and Scott Alexander. You need the great
47:58
peacemaker and Hayawa. You need Wallace Farard Muhammad and Elijah Muhammad. You
48:04
need Marks and Engles. That dynamic, the creator of it all and their smartest,
48:11
most gregarious, most devoted follower is all you need to start a movement that lasts even after the successor figure is
48:18
long gone. You only need one smooth transfer of power for the mandate of heaven to transubstantiate from you to
48:25
your followers. Your beliefs can be as crazy as you want. But what decides whether a distinctive movement lives or
48:31
dies is the charisma not of the leader, but of the leader's chosen successor.
48:36
Otherwise, when death inevitably comes, everyone just stands around the grave of the leader, hoping against hope that
48:42
they'll return from the dead. Nobody has the authority to say our leader will be back eventually or their body may be
48:49
dead but their words live on so march on. William Potter could have taken up
48:54
the public universal friends legacy since he purportedly reconciled with the friend right before the friend's death.
49:00
But another issue that prevented the public universal friends movement from outliving the friend was that they
49:05
really weren't cultlike enough. The other thing a successful cult needs is
49:11
something weird that separates insiders and outsiders. You need Zenu. You need a
49:16
fundamental belief so strange that only those who are truly committed devote themselves to it. The public universal
49:22
friend being a genderless divine entity who possessed the body of the deceased Jamaima Wilkinson fits the bill. But the
49:28
whole rest of the friend's theology was bog standard Quakerism. If William Potter had taken the reigns, the Society
49:34
of Universal Friends would have just been a Quaker offshoot, different from the main stem only in having the word
49:41
universal in its name. And the reason it was separate from the rest of the Quakers would be a [clears throat] strange historical footnote. Perhaps so
49:48
many people left simply because it was easy to leave.
49:56
If you hear about the public universal friend today, it's as a non-binary pioneer. Once again, the friend may have
50:03
been the first individual person referred to in English with they them pronouns or possibly a trans mask
50:09
pioneer because many of the friend's followers consistently refer to the friend as a he. [clears throat] We draw
50:15
a line from the public universal friend directly to queer icons like Genesis Poridge. As if that's one consistent
50:22
phenomenon. As if we in 21st century blue America have finally found the correct way to slice and dice the vast
50:29
n-dimensional hyper cube of how culture interacts with gender. As if every one of the rainbow of gender identities that
50:35
has a pride flag now has always existed in every culture. As if there must have been as many public universal friends in
50:42
the 1700s as there are they thems watching this video now. And it's only because of oppression that we don't know
50:48
about them.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zx5TzjRkiFc?si=4OlE3MjwvBAXWu1d" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
video 3:
the video maker is an admitted obsessive and tho often lost in minutiae, strings a few stretches of 'keyhole' seethrus together here and there.
Here's one on the forerunner of Elijah Mohammed, a mixrace called 'Fard' .. the shadowy history of the 1930s: youtu.be/nIGceyJICwo
Was The Founder Of The Nation of Islam A White Guy From Oregon?
Tor's Cabinet of Curiosities
204K subscribers
357,701 views Feb 28, 2025
Sliding into home plate, as it were, for my Black History Month episode on the last day of February. Which is fitting, I guess, since this episode is about someone who, despite making his mark on black American history, surprisingly wasn't Black at all.
5:06 -- "pop scifi"...
...... Malcolm X converted to
1:05:14
mainstream Sunni Islam and began criticizing the NOI as a bunch of un-Islamic weirdos. For a year,
1:05:22
he was under constant death threats from NOI members, and while it’s not clear who eventually pulled the trigger, several different members of the NOI openly swore to kill him.
1:05:32
In the aftermath of the NOI’s 1960s day in the sun, Elijah Muhammad’s son Warith Deen
1:05:38
Muhammad took control of the NOI in 1975 and moved it away from Fard’s bizarre teachings,
1:05:44
closer to mainstream Islam. Others criticized this move, and a former calypso singer and NOI member,
1:05:51
Louis Farrakhan, re-established the NOI with all its janky old beliefs, plus a heaping dose of antisemitism, a few years later. He’s been in charge of the main
1:06:00
sect ever since.
On Fard:
Contemporary
12:53
news reports call him black; other contemporary news reports call him white. The five known
12:59
pictures of him depict a dapper man with straight black hair, European-looking facial features, and
13:04
possibly brown skin, though it’s obviously hard to tell in black-and-white pictures. He could be
13:10
a light-skinned black man, or a swarthy, Southern European white man. Or he could be Middle Eastern,
13:15
or South Asian, or Hispanic, or conceivably even East Asian - in other words, we have absolutely no
13:22
idea. People who met him describe him giving wildly contradictory reports of his origin:
13:28
he often said that he was from Mecca, but he also said he was descended from Russian Jews.
13:33
To his black followers, he sometimes claimed that he was black, but he had deliberately
13:38
lightened his skin somehow in order to pass as white. Sometimes he said he had a degree from
13:43
Oxford. While we can’t be sure about anything in this guy’s life, it’s quite likely that in the hyper-segregated world he inhabited, being able to pass as any race was a powerful gift.
posted by piety piet at 2:15 AM
0 comments
